Introduction | Contents | Notes | Author | Reviews | Feedback
Herring's results contradict studies carried out by Lee Sproull and Sara Kiesler. In their book Connections, a study of the use of electronic communications in networked organizations, they conclude:
![]()
Because it is harder to read status cues in electronic messages
than it is in other forms of communication, high-status people do
not dominate the discussion in electronic groups as much as they
do in face-to-face groups. For instance, when groups of executives
met face-to-face, the men in the groups were five times as likely as
the women to make the first decision proposal. When those same
groups met via computer, the women made the first proposal as
often as the men did.[8]
![]()
Other women report personal experiences that back up Sproull and Kiesler's
research. "Usenet, while it can be nasty, acerbic, uncaring and unsympathetic, is
truly a nondiscriminatory society," writes Judy Anderson, who styles herself yduJ
("rhymes with fudge") on Usenet.[9] "It judges you only through your
postings, not by what you look like, your marital status, whether you have a
disability, or any of the other things that are traditionally used for discrimination."
![]()
"On the Internet you are only what you choose to reveal," consultant Frances Bell
wrote in an email message to the editor of London's Independent newspaper
protesting an article about Internet hostility. "People contact me because of what I
do and how I do it. Now I may be politically naive, but I thought this was the goal of
the ideal workplace: an environment where people of whatever gender are sought-
after because of what they do regardless of disability, physical attractiveness or
age.[10]
![]()
But the image of women confidently striding the Net is not the one projected in the
mainstream media. Instead, we get articles like Newsweek's 1994 cover story
"Men, Women, and Computers,[11] which characterized the Net as
essentially hostile to women and filled with aggressive, obnoxious, sexually
predatory men who like playing with computers and exploring, as opposed to
practical, beleaguered women who "just want their computers to work." I have
news: that's what everybody wants, man or woman. It's because they don't "just
work" that it's necessary for us to waste brain cells on the knowledge that our home
PC is a clock-doubled 486SX/25 with 16Mb of RAM and almost no free hard disk
space so we can explain this to the technical support guy when we can't get our
mysteriously silent sound cards to squawk unpleasantly. Not having to know this
kind of thing would certainly free up some useful mental space for more valuable
information, as Macintosh users around the world are only too happy to remind us
with religious fervor.
![]()
Much of the scientific evidence purporting to show that women and men are
intrinsically different has been challenged, notably in psychologist Carol Tavris's
The Mismeasure of Woman. "Are women really kinder, gentler, and more
interconnected with people and the environment than men are?" she writes
skeptically. "Are the qualities of peacefulness and connection to others endemic to
female nature, or are they a result of the nurturing, caretaking work that women do
because of their social and family roles? For that matter, are these qualities truly
more characteristic of women than men, or are they merely human archetypes--
stereotypes of female and male--that blur when we look more closely at actual
human beings?[12]
![]()
Tavris's conclusion is especially interesting for those studying gender interactions
on the Net: "Just as when in Rome most people do as Romans do, the behavior of
women and men depends as much on the gender they are interacting with than on
anything intrinsic about the gender they are.[13]In other words, the
difference between men and women online may not be determined by their own
gender but by the gender they believe their correspondents are. By this theory, if
both women and men believe that the online world is largely male, their behavior
may warp accordingly. This makes sense to me, especially since I have trouble with
most research that purports to find intrinsic differences between men and women: I
always find my behavior a closer match to the supposedly male portion of the
  
Copyright © 1997-99 NYU Press. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without written permission of New York University Press is prohibited.
Be sure to visit the NYU Press Bookstore
[Design by NiceMedia]